After searching through different links provide by The National Association for Bilingual Education, I was overwhelmed with various information and articles relating to early childhood and education in general. I decided to focus on a particular link provided that supplied several articles relating to the 'No Child Left Behind' act.
One article that caught my attention does not relate to the NABE and their advocacy for bilingualism, but mentions the students who are left behind when programs do not quite live up to their expected abilities and results. Rubalcava (2004) illustrates one class where the lead teacher posts names of children to have risen to the top in reading and math on a weekly basis and the students participate in "discussions, partner reading, read-alouds, and fact games." Occasional field trips are set up and allotted times of the year are designated for play. This provides structure and benchmarking, making it more streamline for educators and programs to organize and create a cohesive curriculum. However, as Rubalcava (2004) continues, it is clear that students feel stressed and focus on test scores, which is a potential danger of 'No Child Left Behind', thus leaving students with less energy for creativity and intrinsic motivation, which are key roles in a child's development.
Leaving english learners behind (Petersen, 2002) relates to the lack of equity in early childhood education. Petersen explains that the NABE advocates bilingual learning and that Limited English Proficient (LEP) students were exempted from tests and ignored, which creates limitations in accessibility because not all LEP students get the education they deserve when excluded from certain key areas. However, this does not mean that students should be thrown into having standardized English tests where immigrant students (who may have resided in USA for only a week) in states, such as Indiana, would be forced to take tests in a language that they do not understand (Petersen, 2002). Researching these articles have allowed me to gain a better grasp of how many restrictions there are within education and that there are many students that get "left behind" because of increased standards and changes in policies. Even with the constant improvements made within early childhood education, key details are being forgotten, meaning that young children are missing out on proper education opportunities because of factors, such as language barriers or inaccessibility.
Resources
Petersen, B. (2002). Leaving english learners behind. Rethinking Schools. Retrieved from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/special_reports/bushplan/leav171.shtml
Rubalcava, M. (2004). Leaving children behind. Rethinking Schools. Retrieved from http://www.rethinkingschools.org/special_reports/bushplan/leav191.shtml